6 Critical Reviews on the Performance of Molded Pulp Containers

Table of Contents

Molded pulp containers offer eco-friendliness and cost savings but face challenges in durability, design flexibility, and manufacturing efficiency.

Environmental Impact

Molded pulp containers are usually made from recycled paper or cardboard or agricultural byproducts and are thus a sustainable way to package products. It allows using fewer nonrenewable resources in packaging, such as plastic. According to papermcp.com, about 40% less energy is used in the production of a typical molded pulp container compared to the production of a similar plastic container. Water usage of 50 liters per kilogram of the finished product is also quite significant. These containers are very beneficial in waste disposal as well: they decompose in a commercial composting site in 90 days, whereas it takes hundreds of years for a plastic one. The recycling rates of paper and pulp materials are reported to stand at 67.4%. The waste management factor makes life easier for consumers who wish to reduce environmental pressure by properly getting rid of used products.

Paperstock.com states that the pulping process results in the emission of sulfur and nitrogen oxides that can produce harmful air pollution, not to mention the smell and gas that are released and could be considered pollution as well. Facilities usually have to spend even more money that is diverted to buying scrubbers and other equipment for control polluted air to comply with the environmental regulations in the USA. The transition to molded pulp products may cause one-time costs in buying new machinery that is necessary for the production. Such equipment costs between $200,000 to $500,000.


Durability and Protection

Even though molded pulp containers are known for their positive environmental characteristics, the structure is not sustainable when exposed to certain stressors. For example, whereas most of the described containers are capable of supporting weights up to 10 kilograms, which is adequate for a large number of retail products, it is inferior to the 20 kilograms that the majority of plastic containers are capable of managing. As a result, they are not adopted in industrial environments in which heavier items need to be carried. In addition, moisture, and especially the humid environment of hot liquid-filled products, is bound to reduce the strength of molded pulp significantly.

For a regular container, liquid absorption can reach 10% of its weight, leading to the product softening and potentially losing form. In other words, they cannot be used to transfer liquid-based products or be stored in moist environments. Such characteristics to make waterproofing products more expensive by up to 15%-20% by using a lining or coating. It is suggested to use wax or PLA, which adds $0.05 to the usual cost per unit, extending the life of the product even if it is exposed to unfavorable conditions. Utilizing this approach would allow molded pulp to be used across industries, including food service, in which grease and water resistance is irreplaceable.

Cost Effectiveness

When businesses assess the cost-effectiveness of molded pulp containers, the direct and indirect financial impacts are considered. The direct cost of producing a molded pulp container averages $0.25 per unit, slightly more than $0.20 per unit for a comparable plastic container. The higher cost is entirely related to raw materials, whose consumption for pulp production is generally more variable, while for plastic containers, they are synthetic and less changeable. Although molded pulp is more expensive to form, it saves far more in the long run due to disposal of waste. Most city dumps take less money for the disposal of biodegradable waste than plastic, anywhere from 15 to 50 percent less in the cost of disposing of biodegradable waste will be saved, depending on the local city. In most cases, for companies producing significant amounts of packaged waste, such savings have a considerable impact.

Companies can also effectively take advantage of the transition to molded pulp by expanding the use of environmentally friendly containers in green marketing that opens up tremendous marketing opportunities. Consumers are more inclined to accept and are even willing to pay more for goods that have environmentally friendly packaging. The researchers found that 30% of U.S. consumers would pay at least 10% more for products with green packaging. In addition, companies that expand their production using environmentally friendly materials can use governmental incentives later, such as tax relief, grants, and subsidies that can exceed slightly higher costs. For instance, a small business could get a twenty percent tax credit that would pay for the cost increase caused by the new raw material production plan.

Design Limitations

Molded pulp containers possess certain design limitations which limit their applicability to the whole range of packaging requirements. While plastic containers can be efficiently produced in a range of complex shapes and sizes, molded pulp manufacturing is currently mostly suitable for simpler shapes. As such, applications where packaging geometry may deviate significantly from a box, a cylinder, etc., would not be suitable for molded pulp packaging. Another serious limitation is texture – molded pulp is much more rough to the touch than virtually any type of plastics. This can cause potential issues with labels, many of which do not stick to rough surfaces well and/or appear crumpled on uneven ones.

The appearance of the packaging, and how customers perceive it, may have an effect on markets where packaging differentiation is essential in customer loyalty and retention. Recent technological developments struggle with these limitations and enable molded pulp products to have smoother finishes and more detail, although at a significant cost. Precisely machined molds and general work involved in fashioning a high-resolution molded pulp container results in higher production costs, which can rise by 20 to 30%. For example, a company wishing to produce a molded pulp container for its high-end electronic product might experience great difficulties in achieving the necessary levels of precision obtainable with a custom-made plastic solution. Dropping down to an off-the-shelf fiber or plastic packaging solution would lead to a significant decrease in costs and, most importantly, the packaging time, but the overall effect on the perceived value of the product may not be positive.


Consumer Perception

The perception of molded pulp containers depends on public awareness of environmental issues and the market segment. In sectors such as organic foods or eco-products, molded pulp packaging is positively perceived by customers as an indicator of sustainability. At the same time, customers of premium products may feel that such packaging is cheap or inferior. The distinguishing feature of molded pulp containers is their texture and appearance, which looks rougher or less suitable than traditional materials such as glass or dense plastic. According to the surveys, two-thirds of consumers are more likely to buy sustainably packaged food, and the proportion is higher among younger consumers. Thus, the change of values in modern society gives firms the opportunity to use molded pulp as a marketing tool by packaging products in accordance with consumer ethics.

With the examples of success in using molded pulp, it is possible to note that the transition of materials is combined with the consumer education about the benefits of using molded pulp. For example, a well-known coffee chain switched to 100% compostable molded pulp cup carriers and successfully implemented the decision by attracting customers to participate in the initiative. Among other things, the company received a 5% increase in favorable names in social networks. However, the overall market acceptance of molded pulp is limited by the physical properties of the material, which does not allow creating a sensation of premium quality in some product categories. In light of this, it is possible to say that the market opportunity of the material is conditional and depends on the specific implementation.

Manufacturing Challenges

The manufacturing of molded pulp containers poses some unique challenges that may affect production efficiency and scalability. The most significant problem that has to be mentioned in this respect is the drying process, which is resource-consuming and time-consuming. On average, the manufacturing process of a single batch of containers may last approximately 24 hours, and the vast majority of the time is required for the drying process. By contrast, plastic injection molding used to produce similar batches may require less than an hour, which makes the slower production process one of the most burning problems. From the sustainability perspective, energy use during the process is another prominent disadvantage. The drying process alone may require up to 50 kilowatt-hours per metric ton of output and is reported as one of the most energy-consuming processes linked to the creation of molded pulp products.

On the one hand, it contributes significantly to the production costs, and on the other hand, raises the environmental footprint of the material, which has traditionally been associated with the environmentally favorable alternative. In addition, the maintenance of the quality of the final product poses a considerable challenge for this type of manufacturing. As a matter of fact, even minor alterations of pulp mixture, humidity, and temperature may result in significant differences in thickness, weight, and strength, and manufacturers have to use smart control systems preventing such issues. On average, their use can inflate costs by up to 10%-15% of overall production expenses. These challenges are being addressed by using moisture monitoring systems to control and maintain proper humidity, reducing the drying time and improving the quality of drying, and using Molded fiber production modules to ensure the highest efficiency.

Overall, drying and energy consumption issues, as well as those linked to maintaining the consistency of the product, are being addressed by the development and use of appropriate technologies. For instance, the drying time can be reduced by at least 50% through the use of the modern drying module with variable heating temperature and the new drying technology using radio frequency and microwave drying. The use of AI for the implementation of real-time quality control systems to allow monitoring and adjustment of production parameters can keep the final product consistent, and the use of the Molded fiber production module can be linked to their use to achieve the highest efficiency. One example of how such approaches may be used to optimize the manufacturing process is provided by the company specializing in molded pulp packaging for sensitive electronics. The company uses automated quality control to maintain the product’s thickness within specifications and eliminate return rates as the source of disadvantages attributed to the materials. The digitized end-of-line inspection reduced the variability of the product by 20%, leading to fewer float claims and customer returns due to the flaws of the packaging.

News Post
Scroll to Top